Training for Open-Ended Drilling through a Virtual Reality Simulation

Virtual Reality (VR) can support effective and scalable training of psychomotor skills in manufacturing. However, many industry training modules offer experiences that are close-ended and do not allow for human error. We aim to address this gap in VR training tools for psychomotor skills training by exploring an open-ended approach to the system design. We designed a VR training simulation prototype to perform open-ended practice of drilling using a 3-axis milling machine. The simulation employs near "end-to-end" instruction through a safety module, a setup and drilling tutorial, open-ended practice complete with warnings of mistakes and failures, and a function to assess the geometries and locations of drilled holes against an engineering drawing. We developed and conducted a user study within an undergraduate-level introductory fabrication course to investigate the impact of open-ended VR practice on learning outcomes. Study results reveal positive trends, with the VR group successfully completing the machining task of drilling at a higher rate (75% vs 64%), with fewer mistakes (1.75 vs 2.14 score), and in less time (17.67 mins vs 21.57 mins) compared to the control group. We discuss our findings and limitations and implications for the design of open-ended VR training systems for learning psychomotor skills.Comment: 10 pages, 4 figures, 9 table

Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty: Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007

Today, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the safest and most efficient surgical treatments. New materials, surgical techniques and design concepts intended to improve THA have not always been successful. Thorough preclinical and early clinical investigations can detect some aspects of under-performing, while continuing surveillance is recommended to detect and analyze reasons for any later appearing flaws. In this thesis, several ways to monitor and assess THA performance are explored and carried out, using survival analysis in registry studies, radiostereometry (RSA), radiology and clinical outcome. In Paper I, a study using the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) registry shows that HRA had an almost 3-fold increased early non-septic revision risk and that risk factors were found to be female sex, certain HRA designs and units having performed few HRA procedures. Papers II and III contain comparisons of highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) and conventional polyethylene (PE). XLPE had a considerably lower wear rate up to 10 years but showed no obvious improvements regarding implant fixation, BMD or clinical outcome. In the NARA registry, in 2 of 4 studied cup designs the XLPE version had a lower risk of revision for aseptic loosening compared to the PE version. Paper IV describes that stem subsidence and retrotorsion measured with RSA at 2 years predicted later aseptic stem failure in an unfavorably altered, previously well-functioning cemented femoral stem. In Paper V and VI, a novel approach to measure articulation wear with RSA in radiodense hip arthroplasty articulations was presented and evaluated. Subsequently, a comparison between ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) and metal-on-conventional PE uncemented THA displayed a considerably lower wear rate, smaller periacetabular bone lesions and a relatively high squeaking rate, the latter with unknown long-term consequences, in the COC hips. Implant fixation, heterotopic ossification and clinical outcome did not differ between articulation types. In conclusion, it was confirmed that implant surveillance can be done with RSA, also in radiodense THA. Early migration predicts later aseptic implant failure. Prolonged surveillance can confirm long-term material and design performance, verify or contradict anticipated advantages as well as detect unanticipated long-term complications

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

FOXE1 association with both isolated cleft lip with or without cleft palate, and isolated cleft palate

Nonsyndromic orofacial clefts are a common complex birth defect caused by genetic and environmental factors and/or their interactions. A previous genome-wide linkage scan discovered a novel locus for cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) at 9q22–q33. To identify the etiologic gene, we undertook an iterative and complementary fine mapping strategy using family-based CL/P samples from Colombia, USA and the Philippines. Candidate genes within 9q22–q33 were sequenced, revealing 32 new variants. Concurrently, 397 SNPs spanning the 9q22–q33 2-LOD-unit interval were tested for association. Significant SNP and haplotype association signals (P = 1.45E − 08) narrowed the interval to a 200 kb region containing: FOXE1, C9ORF156 and HEMGN. Association results were replicated in CL/P families of European descent and when all populations were combined the two most associated SNPs, rs3758249 (P = 5.01E − 13) and rs4460498 (P = 6.51E − 12), were located inside a 70 kb high linkage disequilibrium block containing FOXE1. Association signals for Caucasians and Asians clustered 5′ and 3′ of FOXE1, respectively. Isolated cleft palate (CP) was also associated, indicating that FOXE1 plays a role in two phenotypes thought to be genetically distinct. Foxe1 expression was found in the epithelium undergoing fusion between the medial nasal and maxillary processes. Mutation screens of FOXE1 identified two family-specific missense mutations at highly conserved amino acids. These data indicate that FOXE1 is a major gene for CL/P and provides new insights for improved counseling and genetic interaction studies